This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| less than a minute read

When conditions become marginal, who makes the call?

This has always been an intriguing question… 

Risk Assessments come into play including those responsible for any mitigation actions.

API will always infer the Q2 Services QMS supports this decision making process past on protocols, processes and detailed risk analysis.

 

 

Nobody really wants to be the person who stops the job. That's the uncomfortable truth behind every marginal sea state conversation offshore. The bridge team is watching the waves. The client rep is watching the schedule. The deck crew is watching the crane. The marine coordinator aligns the different operational inputs. And somewhere onshore, a project team is watching the cost. Different perspectives; different priorities. In theory, the authority is defined, and safety always wins. In practice, marginal conditions can blur the line between who may stop the operation and who recommends proceeding. While the captain retains overriding authority for vessel safety, different crew members may each have responsibility to stop an operation within their area. Problems arise when these roles, limits, and escalation paths are not clearly understood before pressure builds.

Tags

data analytics, energy innovation, energy tech, energy transition, sustainability strategy, supply chain assurance, process optimisation